Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Question

Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Answer

The two are so entwined its near impossible for me to separate them into different beings.brbrMy knowledge would crumble, prone to atrophy without the mortar of my imagination to hold it together. If imagination and curiosity left me, knowledge in time would disintegrate, zombified like a patient at Bedlam.brbrBut without knowledge, my imagination would have nothing to propel it. Under the umbrella of a wealth of knowledge, imagination can run wild, picking up little pieces of knowledge to reassemble them into something new bearing the offspring of knowledge, an idea. Without that umbrella, it will die and wither in the sun, like a worm on the sidewalk.brbrYin and yang, balance, you know? Im not sure either one can be its own entity, they are two sides to the same coin.brbrbrBut after a raging internal debate, if I absolutely had to choose, I cant live without imagination. Id rather be a drooling idiot whos good at making stuff up than a brilliant mind as imaginative as a white tube sock.brbrGood question.

Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Question

Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Answer

The two are so entwined its near impossible for me to separate them into different beings.brbrMy knowledge would crumble, prone to atrophy without the mortar of my imagination to hold it together. If imagination and curiosity left me, knowledge in time would disintegrate, zombified like a patient at Bedlam.brbrBut without knowledge, my imagination would have nothing to propel it. Under the umbrella of a wealth of knowledge, imagination can run wild, picking up little pieces of knowledge to reassemble them into something new bearing the offspring of knowledge, an idea. Without that umbrella, it will die and wither in the sun, like a worm on the sidewalk.brbrYin and yang, balance, you know? Im not sure either one can be its own entity, they are two sides to the same coin.brbrbrBut after a raging internal debate, if I absolutely had to choose, I cant live without imagination. Id rather be a drooling idiot whos good at making stuff up than a brilliant mind as imaginative as a white tube sock.brbrGood question.

Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Question

Which is more important to you Your imagination or your knowledge?

Answer

The two are so entwined its near impossible for me to separate them into different beings.brbrMy knowledge would crumble, prone to atrophy without the mortar of my imagination to hold it together. If imagination and curiosity left me, knowledge in time would disintegrate, zombified like a patient at Bedlam.brbrBut without knowledge, my imagination would have nothing to propel it. Under the umbrella of a wealth of knowledge, imagination can run wild, picking up little pieces of knowledge to reassemble them into something new bearing the offspring of knowledge, an idea. Without that umbrella, it will die and wither in the sun, like a worm on the sidewalk.brbrYin and yang, balance, you know? Im not sure either one can be its own entity, they are two sides to the same coin.brbrbrBut after a raging internal debate, if I absolutely had to choose, I cant live without imagination. Id rather be a drooling idiot whos good at making stuff up than a brilliant mind as imaginative as a white tube sock.brbrGood question.

In which do you believe in more Darwins theory about evolution or Adam and Eve ?please motivate your answer

Question

In which do you believe in more Darwins theory about evolution or Adam and Eve ?please motivate your answer

Answer

I believe in Darwin theory, even if it has its flaws. And as a theory it accepts being questioned, revised, corrected, improved and, more importantly, it can help to get a better understanding of our environment, it can lead to more knowledge.brbrI am aware that the catholic church position in the adam and eve discussion is quotthat it shouldnt be taken literally nor like an historical accountquot. Now about those creationist that take this story as quotliterally truequot, well, I rather not state an opinion.brbrId like to add that the evolution theory explains the develop of life from simple living beings to more complex being, its not a theory to explain the creation of the universe or the initial living being.brbrAnd if life cant be created by chance, but it needs a creator, then, who created the creator? Hesheit, as a living being, would need a creator as well, according to the argument that life needs creation, if something can live without creation, then the argument is false. And if he can exists without a creator, why cant life, as we know it, exist without a creator?